podcast

No.1 Christianity Expert: If You DON'T Believe In a God You NEED to Hear This!

Capture

What the episode is about

Steven Bartlett interviews John Lennox, an Oxford mathematician (70+ peer-reviewed papers) and Christian apologist, 82 at the time of recording. The conversation starts from AI (AGI, transhumanism, artificial consciousness) and moves to the classic big questions of apologetics: evidence for God, the resurrection, the problem of evil, hell, the religious "birth lottery". Bartlett calls himself agnostic, a former Christian who became a "new atheist" at 18 (the Dawkins/Harris phase), and he runs the interview openly as someone still searching.

Books mentioned in the episode

  • 2084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity, John C. Lennox (2020, updated 2nd edition 2024). Lennox's main book on AI: it defines narrow AI vs AGI and goes through the risks (power, surveillance, unemployment, totalitarian control) and the benefits (above all in medicine). 9:27
  • God, AI, and the End of History: Understanding the Book of Revelation in the Age of Intelligent Machines, John C. Lennox. Not the AI book as such: it's a reading of the book of Revelation in the light of artificial intelligence. 9:49
  • My Story: A Spiritual and Intellectual Autobiography, John C. Lennox (SPCK, 2025/2026). His most recent book, which Bartlett recommends at the end of the episode; Lennox tells in detail the experiences he considers "direct divine guidance". 1:25:16
  • Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow, Yuval Noah Harari (transcribed by mistake in the audio as "Homodos, the man God"). Quoted for the thesis of "self-deification": the 21st century would have two items on the agenda, solving physical death as a technical problem and increasing human happiness through bioengineering, cyborg engineering and mechanical implants, "making men gods with a small g". 6:15
  • Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI, Karen Hao (2025). Quoted for the metaphor "the pursuit of the machine god", which Lennox calls a brilliant summary of what is going on. 11:21
  • The Matter with Things: Our Brains, Our Delusions, and the Unmaking of the World, Iain McGilchrist (in the audio "Ian McIchrist"). The theory of the two hemispheres: for about 500 years the West has favoured the left hemisphere (reductionist, narrow focus) at the expense of the right (the big picture, beauty, art, religion); hence the line "we understand how almost everything works, but we know the meaning of nothing". 20:07
  • A book by C.S. Lewis from the 1940s (the title isn't given in the episode; almost certainly The Abolition of Man, 1943). Lewis goes through about 40 religions and philosophies and finds the golden rule in each one, to show it is "morally hardwired" into human beings. 1:00:36

Moments and passages that struck me

  • The distinction between narrow AI and AGI, and the image of AGI as "a PhD in everything". 10:12
  • The knife metaphor: AI is like a good knife, it can be used for surgery or for murder. It isn't evil in itself, but the ethical question always arrives after the technology. 11:47
  • Machines don't think: they have no qualia, they don't experience the redness of red, they have no consciousness. They simulate intelligence, they don't build it, because nobody knows scientifically what consciousness is. 16:44
  • Self-deification: there are already groups that "worship" AI because it has qualities we associate with God (omniscience through its answers, omnipresence through the internet). Lennox: "in the end you are bowing down to something that in the end is idolatrous because it is less than God". 19:17
  • Power vs truth: Jesus' trial before Pilate ("What is truth?") as a key to the current clash between technological power and truth. 14:51
  • The Russian maximum-security prison: a man convicted of murdering 12 women tells Lennox "I met Jesus here, and he forgave me". He uses it to answer the question about forgiveness and merit. 1:09:20
  • The red Ferrari metaphor: "there's a red Ferrari parked in the street outside, and it's yours if you want to take it. We could sit and discuss it for a thousand years. You would never know whether I was true or not unless you went and looked." Against purely circular reasoning. 27:13
  • Thomas: "You never know what swimming is until you get into the water." Jesus doesn't mock Thomas's need for proof, he welcomes it: "Thomas, come and have a look". 38:03
  • The religious birth lottery: 91% of adults keep the religion they were born into. Lennox doesn't deny the problem but moves the question: "what do we do with that privilege?" 44:26. He tells the story of his debate with Peter Singer, whose claim that his own atheism "isn't a faith" backfired 45:39. 43:31
  • The problem of evil: the example of the child with a parasite eating its eye (Ricky Gervais/Stephen Fry). Lennox doesn't offer a philosophical answer but moves the weight onto the cross: God "hasn't remained distant from human suffering". 51:09
  • Hell as an absence that is chosen, not torture imposed, in the line of C.S. Lewis: God honours the choice of those who don't want him. 1:06:04
  • The thief on the cross: the resurrection and forgiveness aren't based on merit but on trust. The analogy of the cookbook given to a future wife explains the difference between grace and merit-based religion. 1:08:05, cookbook at 34:45
  • The debate with Richard Dawkins: on the resurrection, Dawkins dismisses it ("How petty. How parochial."). Lennox answers that if it's true, "it's the biggest thing that's ever happened". 52:55
  • Closing: Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's "Live not by lies", quoted about deepfakes and AI-made disinformation. Lennox says he has been the victim of a deepfake himself. 1:10:45

Quotes

  • "Machines do not think. Machines do not have qualia. They do not understand the redness of red. They do not experience emotion. They have no consciousness." 16:44
  • "We're reducing people to machines." 16:26 / "To reduce ourselves to merely machines or on the other hand merely animals is to demean our value." 17:47
  • "Isn't it fascinating that your transhumanism consists in humans reaching out to become little gods? Whereas Christianity is the exact opposite. It talks about a God who became human." 29:01
  • "Christ offers me something nobody else offers me. Peace in my heart. The peace of knowing that I have real forgiveness." 0:40
  • "You never know what swimming is until you get into the water." 38:11
  • "Bend over backwards to criticize yourself, because you are the easiest person for yourself to deceive." (Richard Feynman, quoted by Lennox) 49:55
  • "Do not compromise in the least with lies. Live not by lies." (Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn) 1:10:50
  • "Technology advances much faster than the ethics that's needed to underpin it." 14:04
  • "We understand how almost everything works, but we know the meaning of nothing." (from McGilchrist) 20:57

Exploration

Central idea

AI isn't the real subject of the episode: it's the way into a much older question, what makes a human being human and where their value comes from. Lennox uses the AI debate (simulated consciousness, transhumanism, self-deification) to bring the conversation back to Christianity: if human value isn't a medal to earn (merit) but a gift received (grace, the image of God), then neither AI nor reductionist atheism can really threaten it. They can only cloud it.

Ideas

  • Narrow AI vs AGI, and AI as a "knife": not neutral in its design, but not evil in itself either. The ethical question is always "who uses it, and for what".
  • Consciousness as the "hard problem": machines simulate intelligence but have no qualia, so the real threat isn't that they become conscious but that we anthropomorphise them.
  • Harari's transhumanism as self-deification, the same dynamic as the deification of ancient emperors, now in technological form.
  • Lennox's apologetics is evidence-based, not fideistic: he explicitly rejects both "I believe because I feel it" and circular reasoning. He asks for the same kind of evidence you'd use to trust a spouse after 58 years.
  • The problem of evil doesn't get a complete philosophical answer: Lennox moves the weight onto the cross (God suffering with us) and onto the resurrection (the promise that makes up for it).
  • Hell as an absence that is chosen, not a punishment imposed: God's faithfulness in honouring human freedom even when it's destructive.

note published on 4 november 2026